Heidi Raguex-Chang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202215-73220California716 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

HEIDI RAGUEX-CHANG; MIGUEL No. 15-73220

ZAPETA-RAGUEX,

Agency Nos. A205-591-388 Petitioners, A202-094-934

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted March 18, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Heidi Raguex-Chang (“Raguex”), a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the

denial, by an Immigration Judge (“IJ”), of her applications for asylum, withholding

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (the “Torture

Convention”).1 We have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 Raguex’s minor son, who is a co-petitioner, is a rider on Raguex’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.