Harold Wilborn v. Alejandro Mayorkas
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202221-56391California470 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HAROLD L. WILBORN, No. 21-56391
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01981-LAB-BGS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Harold L. Wilborn appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his employment action alleging various constitutional and Title VII
violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.
Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); Sommatino v. United…