Harold Wilborn v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202221-56391California470 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HAROLD L. WILBORN, No. 21-56391

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01981-LAB-BGS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2022**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Harold L. Wilborn appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his employment action alleging various constitutional and Title VII

violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); Sommatino v. United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.