Abisuk Sinsaeng v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 202218-72975California468 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABISUK SINSAENG, AKA Apisuk Andy No. 18-72975 Sinsaeng, AKA Avisuk Andy Sinsaeng, Agency No. A037-571-413 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ,** District Judge. Dissent by Judge VANDYKE.

Abisuk Sinsaeng, a native and citizen of Thailand, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding him removable and denying his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. to terminate. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.