Washington v. David Shinn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202205-99009California11,453 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT
DAVID SHINN, Director, ORDER AND Respondent-Appellee. AMENDED
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 8, 2021 San Francisco, California
Filed December 20, 2021 Amended August 29, 2022
Before: Ronald M. Gould, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.
Order; Opinion by Judge Callahan; Concurrence by Judge Gould SUMMARY *
Habeas Corpus/Death Penalty
The panel (1) filed an amended opinion along with Judge Gould’s separate concurrence, (2) denied a petition for panel rehearing, and (3) denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc, in a case in which the panel affirmed the district court’s denial of Theodore Washington’s habeas corpus petition challenging his Arizona conviction and death sentence for first-degree murder.