Doe

Doe v. White CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2022B313836California4,831 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/22 Doe v. White CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

JOHN DOE, 2d Civil No. B313836 (Super. Ct. No. 20CV-0418) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

TIMOTHY P. WHITE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Jane Roe accused John Doe of sexual misconduct while the two were students at California Polytechnic State University– San Luis Obispo (CalPoly). A hearing officer determined that the evidence supported Jane’s accusation, and recommended John’s expulsion. CalPoly administrators agreed with the recommendation and expelled John. John challenged CalPoly’s decision in a petition for writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), arguing that he did not receive a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.