People v. Dill CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2022C095583California866 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/29/22 P. v. Dill CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C095583

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 21CF02004, 21CF03011, 21CM01560)

KEVIN DANIEL DILL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Kevin Daniel Dill asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Defendant filed a supplemental brief. Having reviewed the record and defendant’s supplemental arguments, we conclude defendant’s claims challenge the validity of the pleas or address matters occurring prior to the pleas, and hence are barred because he did not obtain a certificate of probable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.