Briceno

DISCUSSION

I. Briceno failed to provide an adequate record or any

reasoned argument to support his appeal. It is a fundamental rule of appellate review that an appealed judgment or order is presumed correct, and error must be affirmatively shown. (Jameson v. Desta (2018) 5 Cal.5th 594, 609; Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.) “ ‘In the absence of a contrary showing in the record, all presumptions in favor of the trial court’s action will be made by the appellate court.’ ” (Jameson, at p. 609.) To overcome this presumption, the appellant has the burden of providing the appellate court with an

3 adequate record demonstrating error. (Ibid.; Maria P. v. Riles (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1281, 1295.) “ ‘Failure to provide an adequate record on an issue requires that the issue be resolved against [the appellant].’ ” (Jameson, at p. 609.) It is also the appellant’s burden to provide reasoned argument and citations to relevant legal authority to support that argument. (Lee v. Kim (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 705, 721.) On appeal, “ ‘ “ ‘the party asserting trial court error may not . . . rest on the bare assertion of error but must present argument and legal authority on each point…