Stefan Wilcox v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202220-56343California1,068 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEFAN MATTHEW WILCOX, No. 20-56343

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00622-GW-FFM v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 26, 2022**

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

Stefan Wilcox appeals pro se from the district court’s orders granting the

City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Police Department, and officer Erik

Miranda’s motion to dismiss, entering summary judgment in favor of the County

of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, and granting

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the County of Los Angeles, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.