Michael Hunt v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202221-55310California638 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL HUNT, No. 21-55310

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-08064-JFW-PVC v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal MEMORANDUM* corporation; CHARLES L. BECK, in his individual and official capacity; MATTHEW

M. JOHNSON, in his individual and official

capacity; DOES, 1-10,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 26, 2022**

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

Michael Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional and state law violations.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.