Juan Castillo-Castillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 202219-73307California589 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN ELENIN CASTILLO-CASTILLO, No. 19-73307

Petitioner, Agency No. A089-863-877

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 1, 2022**

Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Juan Elenin Castillo-Castillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for

cancellation of removal, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.