Rotter

Rotter v. Feng CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2022B313628California4,511 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 8/29/22 Rotter v. Feng CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

SAM ROTTER, 2d Civil No. B313628 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2021- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00549228-CU-MC-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

TIAN FENG, as President of the California Architects Board,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appellant Sam Rotter was a licensed architect. He claims that, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the California Architects Board (CAB) failed to accommodate his attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during architect licensing examinations he took in 2002. Appellant eventually passed the examination, but in 2004 the CAB revoked his license. He contends that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.