Richard Manriquez v. Joel Ensley
46 F.4th 1124
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202220-16917California5,440 words
Opinion
Opinion
LEE, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD MANRIQUEZ, No. 20-16917 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:18-cv-02026-
DWL
JOEL CHRISTIAN ENSLEY; BRYAN
LAWRENCE,
Defendants-Appellants, OPINION
and
TOWN OF SUPERIOR, a political subdivision; RICHARD H. MUELLER;
ANTHONY DORAN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 10, 2021 Pasadena, California
Filed August 30, 2022 Before: Daniel P. Collins and Kenneth K. Lee, Circuit Judges, and Jill Otake, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Lee; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Otake
SUMMARY **
Civil Rights
The panel reversed the district court’s denial of qualified immunity to police officers in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the officers violated the Fourth Amendment when they expanded the scope of a search warrant without physically amending the warrant.
The police officers at first complied with the requirement that a warrant include a description of the “place to be searched,” by…