Corecivic, Inc. v. Candide Group, LLC
46 F.4th 1136
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202220-17285California6,462 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CORECIVIC, INC., No. 20-17285 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:20-cv-03792-
WHA
CANDIDE GROUP, LLC; MORGAN
SIMON,
Defendants-Appellees. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 14, 2022 San Francisco, California
Filed August 30, 2022
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Ronald M. Gould, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge S.R. Thomas; Dissent by Judge Bea SUMMARY*
California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute
The panel held that the special motion provision of California’s anti-SLAPP statute applied in federal court, and affirmed in part the district court’s order granting Candide Group, LLC’s motion to strike a defamation complaint brought by CoreCivic, Inc., under California’s anti-SLAPP statute.
At issue were several statements in articles published by Morgan Simon on Forbes.com that connected CoreCivic to the detention of separated families at the U.S. border and characterized its lobbying efforts…