People v. McGowan CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2022D080396California135 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the following possible issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the trial court erred in finding

2 McGowan’s petition for resentencing did not state a prima facie case for relief. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented appellant on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying McGowan’s petition for resentencing under section 1170.22 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O’ROURKE, J.

DATO, J.

3