Baul

Baul v. Lecaros CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2022B315968California2,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/30/22 Baul v. Lecaros CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

AUSTIN BAUL et al., B315968

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. v. No. 21STCV24082)

ADRIANO LECAROS,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Christopher K. Lui, Judge. Affirmed. Austin Baul, in pro. per., and Nila A. Jamias, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Law Offices of Richard Hofman and Richard Hofman for Defendant and Respondent. —————————— Austin Baul and Nila A. Jamias (collectively plaintiffs) appeal from a trial court order granting defendant Adriano Lecaros’s special motion to strike under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.