Jatinder Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 202218-72588California2,345 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 30 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JATINDER SINGH, No. 18-72588

Petitioner, Agency No. A088-390-353

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 9, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: IKUTA and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,** District Judge. Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.

Jatinder Singh seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals denying his second motion to reopen his removal proceedings. The order

was dated August 10, 2018, but Singh did not file his petition for review until

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. days later, on September 21, 2018. Because his filing was untimely, we dismiss the

petition for review for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.