Sarkany

Sarkany v. West CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2022A161728California3,494 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 8/30/22 Sarkany v. West CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JENNIFER SARKANY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A161728

v. CHRISTIE WEST et al., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-18-571355) Defendants and Appellants.

Defendants Christie West and Timothy West challenge an order awarding statutory attorney fees of approximately $684,000 to plaintiffs after a jury trial in a residential landlord-tenant matter. Because we can discern no reasonable basis for the amount of fees awarded by the trial court, we shall reverse and remand for further consideration.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Underlying Litigation Tenants Jennifer Sarkany, Ramsey Abouremeleh, Sandra Fierro, and Nina Robin (plaintiffs) sued Christie…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.