Javier Vanegas v. City of Pasadena

Good Law
46 F.4th 1159
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202221-55478California8,878 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAVIER VANEGAS, No. 21-55478 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-07845-

SVW-AGR

CITY OF PASADENA; CITY OF

PASADENA POLICE DEPARTMENT;

KLOTZ, Individually; in his/her OPINION capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; ARELLANES, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; STARK, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; RIEHL, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; MURREN, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; LEMOS, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; SALAZAR, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; BUNDY, Individually; in his/her capacity as Police Officer for Pasadena Police Department; DOES, 1–10, individually, and in their capacity as Police officers for Pasadena Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.