People v. Lastra CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2022B309895California2,532 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/31/22 P. v. Lastra CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B309895 (Cons. w/ B311783) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. Nos. 20F-06361 A-C, 20M-05512 A-D) v. (San Luis Obispo County)

ROBERT ANTHONY

LASTRA, JR., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT:

Respondents are college students who face criminal charges for marching through the City of San Luis Obispo following the murder of George Floyd, Jr. in 2020. The trial court granted their motion to recuse District Attorney Dan Dow’s office from the case because of Dow’s well-publicized association with critics of the Black Lives Matter movement. (Penal Code, §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.