United States v. Guy Christopher Brooks

Good Law
367 F.3d 1128·2004 WL 1066612·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9349
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 200402-50539California5,694 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Defendant-Appellant Guy Christopher Brooks, convicted in the district court on three counts of bank robbery, challenges the admission of incriminating evidence that police seized in a search of his hotel room made without a warrant. We consider whether the district court committed reversible error by denying Appellant’s pretrial motion to suppress the evidence where that search was prompted by a “911” emergency phone call to the police from a hotel guest, staying in an adjacent room, who thought that she had heard the sounds of a woman being beaten. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

On February 2, 2002, Appellant Brooks and Sharon Andrea Bengis (“Bengis”)— who had been living together for almost three weeks in room # 301 of the Extended Stay America hotel in Lake Forest, California — were breaking up their relationship. It is not disputed that they were at least engaged in an argument so loud that it commanded the attention of a neighboring hotel guest. The guest next door in room # 303 called the police and reported hearing what she thought were sounds of a woman being beaten in room # 301. Deputy Sheriff Marcus Perez (“Perez”) arrived on the scene.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.