Roberto Carriedo-Rosas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202216-73927California1,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 31 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO CARRIEDO-ROSAS, No. 16-73927

Petitioner, Agency No. A097-818-065

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 10, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: BERZON, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Roberto Carriedo-Rosas, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of his 2004 expedited removal order for violation of his due process rights.

He also seeks review of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) finding that he failed to establish

a reasonable fear of persecution or torture, and he argues that the IJ deprived him of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). due process by declining to conduct a new hearing on remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.