Nidia Aguilar Ramirez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202217-71060California665 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 31 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NIDIA GEORGINA AGUILAR RAMIREZ; No. 17-71060

JHONATAN ARIEL MIRANDA

AGUILAR, Agency Nos. A208-123-050

A208-123-051

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 29, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Nidia Aguilar Ramirez seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (“CAT”), for herself and her son, Jhonatan Miranda Aguilar, as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.