Bernd Schaefers v. Blizzard Energy, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202220-60055California417 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 31 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: BERND SCHAEFERS, No. 20-60055

Debtor, BAP No. 20-1067

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

BERND SCHAEFERS,

Appellant,

v.

BLIZZARD ENERGY, INC.; FRANZISKA

SHEPARD,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Spraker, Gan, and Lafferty III, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted August 30, 2022**

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bernd Schaefers appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy

Appellate Panel that affirmed the denial by the bankruptcy court of his homestead

exemption claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we dismiss

the appeal as moot.

Schaefers claimed a homestead exemption in his interest in BKS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.