Barbara Howe v. County of Mendocino
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202221-16665California1,179 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 31 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BARBARA HOWE; L. JANI No. 21-16665
SHEPPARD; CAROL MORGAN,
D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00935-RMI Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF MENDOCINO; TAMMY
MOSS CHANDLER; WILLIAM
SCHURTZ; SHARON CONVERY;
KATHERINE FENGELR,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Robert M. Illman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 29, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, BYBEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs Barbara Howe, L. Jani Sheppard, and Carol Morgan appeal from
the district court’s grant of the 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss of Defendants County of