Barbara Howe v. County of Mendocino

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 202221-16665California1,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 31 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARBARA HOWE; L. JANI No. 21-16665

SHEPPARD; CAROL MORGAN,

D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00935-RMI Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF MENDOCINO; TAMMY

MOSS CHANDLER; WILLIAM

SCHURTZ; SHARON CONVERY;

KATHERINE FENGELR,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Robert M. Illman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 29, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, BYBEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs Barbara Howe, L. Jani Sheppard, and Carol Morgan appeal from

the district court’s grant of the 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss of Defendants County of

Mendocino, Tammy Moss Chandler, William Schurtz, Sharon Convery,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.