Nelvin Garcia-Medina v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202217-71923California677 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NELVIN GARCIA-MEDINA, No. 17-71923

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-869-879

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 29, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Nelvin Garcia-Medina, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his appeal

from the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (CAT).

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 over a portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.