Maria Cadenas Espinoza v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202217-71534California569 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA JAZMIN CADENAS ESPINOZA; No. 17-71534

CRISTAL VIANEY BELLO CADENAS,

Agency Nos. A208-117-705 Petitioners, A208-117-706

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 29, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Maria Jazmin Cadenas Espinoza (“Cadenas”) and her daughter Cristal

Vianey Bello Cadenas (together “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s denial of asylum, withholding

of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.