Maria Cadenas Espinoza v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202217-71534California569 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA JAZMIN CADENAS ESPINOZA; No. 17-71534
CRISTAL VIANEY BELLO CADENAS,
Agency Nos. A208-117-705 Petitioners, A208-117-706
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 29, 2022** Seattle, Washington
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Maria Jazmin Cadenas Espinoza (“Cadenas”) and her daughter Cristal
Vianey Bello Cadenas (together “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico,
petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s denial of asylum, withholding
of removal, and…