Leah Hanrahan v. Statewide Collection, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEAH HANRAHAN, No. 21-16187
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00157-MMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STATEWIDE COLLECTION, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 30, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, BYBEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Defendant-Appellant Statewide Collection, Inc. (“Statewide”) appeals the
district court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to Plaintiff-Appellee Leah
Hanrahan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district
court.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). On January 9, 2019, Hanrahan filed suit against Statewide in the district court,
alleging…