Leah Hanrahan v. Statewide Collection, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202221-16187California796 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEAH HANRAHAN, No. 21-16187

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00157-MMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATEWIDE COLLECTION, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 30, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, BYBEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Statewide Collection, Inc. (“Statewide”) appeals the

district court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to Plaintiff-Appellee Leah

Hanrahan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district

court.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). On January 9, 2019, Hanrahan filed suit against Statewide in the district court,

alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.