Francisco Jimenez-Valero v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202217-71957California822 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO JIMENEZ-VALERO, No. 17-71957

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-265-189

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 29, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Jimenez-Valero, a citizen and native of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s

order of removal denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We deny the petition for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review.

1. Jimenez-Valero has failed to establish changed or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.