Eduardo Castaneda Maldonado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202220-70230California545 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDUARDO CASTANEDA MALDONADO, No. 20-70230

Petitioner, Agency No. A075-690-441

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BENNETT and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FOOTE,*** District Judge.

Eduardo Castaneda Maldonado, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his motion to reopen as

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Elizabeth E. Foote, United States District Judge for the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. untimely. Petitioner filed the motion to reopen alleging ineffective assistance of

counsel and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.