Bryan Hunt v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 202221-56106California605 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRYAN HUNT, individually, and on behalf No. 21-56106 of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:21-cv-06059-PA-RAO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 30, 2022** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: M. SMITH and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and DRAIN,*** District Judge.

Bryan Hunt appeals the district court’s order remanding this case to state court

based on its conclusion that there was a procedural defect in the removal. Ordinarily,

“[a]n…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.