David S. Karton v. Musick, Peeler, Garrett CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 2022B322250California5,436 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/1/22 David S. Karton v. Musick, Peeler, Garrett CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

DAVID S. KARTON, A LAW B322250

CORPORATION,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC206243) v.

MUSICK, PEELER, GARRETT

LLP,

Defendant and Respondent;

DAVID S. KARTON,

Third Party Claimant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Edward B. Moreton, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Benedon & Serlin, Gerald M. Serlin and Melinda W. Ebelhar for Plaintiff and Appellant David S. Karton, a Law Corporation and Third Party Claimant and Appellant David S. Karton. Musick Peeler & Garrett, Cheryl A. Orr; Joshua P. Friedman and Associates, and Joshua P. Friedman for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.