Kui Myles v. United States

Good Law
47 F.4th 1005
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 202220-55910California5,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KUI Z. MYLES, No. 20-55910 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:19-cv-02036-

PSG-KK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAVID

MARIN; BRIAN DEMORE; FRANCIS M.

JACKSON; ARACELI TREVINO; DAVID OPINION

GASSMANN; TROY THOMPSON;

STEVEN LOVETT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2021 Pasadena, California

Filed September 2, 2022

Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Richard D. Bennett, * District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Berzon

* The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **

Federal Tort Claims Act

The panel reversed the district court’s dismissal—under a discretionary function immunity ruling under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”)—of a federal employee plaintiff’s malicious prosecution claim against the United States and individual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.