Shea

Shea v. Haacke CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 2022E077051California2,383 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/2/22 Shea v. Haacke CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ROBIN SHEA, as Successor Trustee, etc.,

E077051

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. MCP1700472) v.

OPINION

RODNEY G. HAACKE,

Defendant and Appellant;

DESRIE PFISTER,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Mark Ashton Cope,

Judge. Affirmed.

The Law Office of Evan D. Williams and Evan D. Williams for Defendant and

Appellant.

Carmel & Naccasha and Victor J. Herrera for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. Robin J. Shea (Trustee), Successor Trustee of The Haacke Family Trust (the

Trust), filed a second accounting and report (the accounting) in the probate court.

Rodney Haacke (Beneficiary), a beneficiary of the Trust, objected to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.