People v. Maclis CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 2022C092941California1,214 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 9/2/22 P. v. Maclis CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C092941

v. (Super. Ct. No. P19CRF0348)

RUBEN MACLIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Ruben Maclis asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Based on our review of the record, we will modify the judgment to strike a domestic violence fee and to vacate a presentence investigative report fee. Finding no other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment as modified. I Defendant and P.R. had two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.