Roberto Jimenez-Marcial v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 202217-70194California883 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO JIMENEZ-MARCIAL, No. 17-70194

Petitioner, Agency No. A092-932-321

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 31, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and DRAIN,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Roberto Jimenez-Marcial, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Gershwin A. Drain, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.