Kui Myles v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 202220-55910California1,755 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KUI Z. MYLES, No. 20-55910

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-02036-PSG-KK v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAVID MEMORANDUM*

MARIN; BRIAN DEMORE; FRANCIS M.

JACKSON; ARACELI TREVINO; DAVID

GASSMANN; TROY THOMPSON;

STEVEN LOVETT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,** District Judge.

Kui Z. Myles filed a complaint against the federal government and five

Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) employees alleging malicious

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. prosecution, abuse of process,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.