Jaime Hoyos v. Ronald Davis
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
SEP 2 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAIME HOYOS, No. 17-99009
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00388-L-NLS v.
RONALD DAVIS, Warden, California MEMORANDUM* State Prison at San Quentin,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 23, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: IKUTA, CHRISTEN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Jaime Hoyos appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254
habeas corpus petition in which he sought relief from his state-court convictions
and death sentence. Hoyos raises several certified claims on appeal. We address
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. all but his Batson claim here.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291
and 2253, and we affirm the district court’s denial of Hoyos’s habeas petition.