Francisco Rivas-Rocha v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 202216-73317California787 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO RIVAS-ROCHA, AKA Jose No. 16-73317 Martines Lopez, Agency No. A077-985-897 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 31, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and DRAIN,*** District Judge.

Francisco Rivas-Rocha petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Gershwin A. Drain, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. applications for withholding of removal under the Immigration and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.