Braulio Palermo-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 202216-72219California1,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRAULIO PALERMO-HERNANDEZ, No. 16-72219 AKA Bravilio Hernandez, AKA Bravlio Palermo Hernandez, AKA Bravilio Palermo- Agency No. A205-297-186 Hernandez, AKA Bravlio Palermo- Hernandez,

MEMORANDUM*

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 31, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Braulio Palermo-Hernandez, a native citizen of Mexico who has

resided within the United States since 2002, petitions for review of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.