Gilbertson v. Albright

Good Law
368 F.3d 1062
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 200402-35460California166 words

Opinion

368 F.3d 1062 Paul Douglas GILBERTSON, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Stuart H. ALBRIGHT; Keith R. Battleson; Jack W. Burris; Suzanne T. Crane; Charles L. Crump; Yolanda I. Guran-Postlethwaite; Charles W. Hester; Ron A. Hoffine; Robert V. Neathamer; R. Charles Pearson; Ronald E. Stuntzner; David P. Taylor; Robert A. Walker; Richard H. Zbinden, in their individual capacities, Defendants — Appellees. No. 02-35460. D.C. No. CV-01-06282-HO. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 17, 2004. Daniel W. Dickerson, Esq., Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Richard D. Wasserman, AAG, Office of the Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees. Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.