Wertz

Wertz v. Weigman CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 2022G060589California1,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/6/22 Wertz v. Weigman CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

VICTORIA WERTZ, as Trustee, etc.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G060589

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2019-01066813)

DOROTHY WEIGMAN, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kim R. Hubbard, Judge. Affirmed. Motion for injunction. Denied. Dorothy Weigman, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Schmiesing, Blied, Stoddart & Mackey, Austin N. Dillon and Anthony G. Lagomarsino, for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * * Dorothy Weigman appeals from the probate court’s order granting respondent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.