Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. v. Weisbord CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 2022D079169MCalifornia8,464 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/6/22 Shustak Reynolds & Partners, P.C. v. Weisbord CA4/1 (unmodified opinion attached)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SHUSTAK REYNOLDS & PARTNERS, D079169

P.C.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- v. 00066060-CU-BC-CTL)

JOSHUA WEISBORD et al., ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

Defendants and Appellants.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 17, 2022, be modified as follows: On page 23, the first sentence of the third full paragraph is stricken and a citation is added to the last sentence of this paragraph. The paragraph now reads as follows: “The Weisbords argue Shustak’s agreement to toll the statute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.