Larry Junior Webster v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, at San Quentin California State Prison

Good Law
369 F.3d 1062·2004 WL 1152813·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10216
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 200402-99009California5,563 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

ORDER

The opinion in this case, which was filed March 5, 2004, 361 F.3d 522 , is amended as follows:

With the amendments, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.

OPINION

This appeal requires us to decide, inter alia, whether Larry Webster’s due process rights were denied by a judicial expansion of California’s definition of death-qualifying special circumstances in violation of Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347 , 84 S.Ct. 1697 , 12 L.Ed.2d 894 (1964). We hold that they were not and reverse the judgment of the district court.

I

This is a capital case arising out of the murder of William Burke. In late August, 1981, Larry Junior Webster was camping near Sacramento with five associates. Several members of the group had robbed a convenience store the previous night, and the group was aware that the police were looking for them. Webster stated that the group needed to get out of town to avoid the police, and suggested luring one of two persons he had met at a nearby gas station to the campsite, killing him, and stealing his car. They planned for Webster and two others in the group — Carl Williams and Joseph Madrigal — to lure the victim back to the camp…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.