United States v. Conrad Albert Krouse, III

Good Law
370 F.3d 965·2004 WL 1233991·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10975
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 200402-50458California1,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

For the first time in this circuit, we must decide what it means to possess a firearm “in furtherance of’ a drug trafficking offense under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)(A). In so doing, we affirm the conviction and 161-month sentence of Conrad Albert Krouse. We conclude that sufficient evidence supports Krouse’s conviction for possession of a firearm “in furtherance” of a drug trafficking crime under § 924(c) because the facts in evidence demonstrate a sufficient nexus between the weapons discovered in Krouse’s home and his drug trafficking operation.

I

This case began with an investigation into the disappearance of various arcade and vending machines from a tavern in Buena Park, California. Suspecting that Krouse had stolen the machines, local police officers executed a search warrant on his home. They discovered the missing machines plus five firearms, ammunition, 86.5 grams of cocaine, and almost 150 pounds of marijuana.

Krouse was ultimately indicted on five federal weapons and drug charges, including one count of possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). At trial, Krouse claimed that the drugs and weapons discovered in his home…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.