Trevor A. Laing v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Good Law
370 F.3d 994·2004 WL 1238961·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11084
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 200403-56158California3,181 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

Trevor Arthur Laing, a native of Jamaica, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. Because the district court erred in finding that Laing had exhausted his judicial remedies and in determining that exhaustion would be futile, we remand to the district court to vacate its order denying the writ and to dismiss the petition.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On February 19, 1997, Laing pleaded guilty to count 1 of an information, which charged him with “conspiracy to SALE/TRANSPORT/POSSESS MARIJUANA FOR SALE, in violation of Section 11360/11359 of the HEALTH AND SAFETY Code, a felony.” Based on his plea, he was convicted on April 18, 1997, of violating California Penal Code § 182, which prohibits two or more people from conspiring to commit any crime, and received a 16-month prison sentence.

Laing’s criminal conviction prompted the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to initiate removal proceedings by serving Laing with a “Notice to Appear,” dated October 31, 1997. On June 4, 1998, Laing filed an application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b. The case was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.