United States v. Ricky D. Ross

Good Law
372 F.3d 1097·64 Fed. R. Serv. 858·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12117·4 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5412
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 200402-50226California7,785 words

Opinion

Opinion

Restani, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Ricky D. Ross was convicted of drug trafficking offenses in 1996. After his first appeal and extensive post-remand proceedings, he now appeals from the district court’s denial of his motions to dismiss the indictment or order a new trial, arguing that government misconduct prejudiced his entrapment defense. He also appeals from the district court’s post-remand sentencing order, alleging several errors. We affirm the district court’s denial of his motions because he was not prejudiced by the government’s behavior, including its failure to disclose that a key informant was rewarded with illegally-obtained permanent resident status. We also affirm the sentencing order as a proper exercise of the district court’s discretion.

FACTS

Ross was arrested along with codefen-dants Leroy Brown and Curtis James in a reverse drug sting on March 2, 1995. The codefendants provided roughly $170,000 in cash to undercover Drug Enforcement Agency Special Agent Pedro Pena and were in turn allowed to take possession of a Chevy Blazer containing 100 kilograms of cocaine. Appearing with Agent Pena at the deal was undercover informant Oscar Danilo Blandón, a convicted drug…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.