Maria Isabel Gonzalez De Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Good Law
374 F.3d 759·2004 WL 1486028·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13741
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 200402-73939California2,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

Maria Isabel Gonzalez De Martinez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)’s decision denying her motion to reopen immigration removal proceedings to apply for an adjustment of status on the basis of her marriage to a United States citizen and the pending visa application filed by her husband. Mrs. De Martinez argues that she was not provided adequate notice of the penalties for failure to depart voluntarily, that two immigration statutes impermissibly conflict, and that she was deprived of due process because aliens who are not eligible for voluntary departure irrationally receive more favorable treatment.

We deny Mrs. De Martinez’s petition for review of the BIA’s decision because we conclude that her contentions lack merit.

I

Mrs. De Martinez is a citizen of Mexico. She entered the United States without inspection in 1987, but was unable to prove her continuous presence prior to 1990. Mrs. De Martinez filed an asylum application on June 2, 1997. She was served with a notice to appear on July 21, 1997. She admitted that she entered illegally and she conceded removability. Mrs. De Martinez was granted time to file an application for cancellation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.