United States v. John Doe

Good Law
374 F.3d 851·2004 WL 1487366·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13791
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 6, 200403-10186California2,787 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ferguson, J.

John Doe challenges a restitution order entered against him on the ground that the government did not prove that the restitution amounts imposed reflected the losses of identified victims. He appeals from an amended judgment of conviction entered after a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) resentencing. We hold that we may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal under both 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and remand to the District Court for resentencing.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Doe was indicted for securities fraud and other offenses in the District of Nevada, the Western District of Michigan, and the District of Utah. He pled guilty to all three sets of charges, and the cases were consolidated in the District of Nevada.

In the “Michigan case,” Doe pled guilty to one count of devising a scheme to defraud and obtain money by false pretenses, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 . In that case, Doe’s investment company had purchased restricted stock of a corporation at a discounted price, and had then resold it on the open market despite promising the corporation it would not do so.

In the “Utah case,” Doe pled guilty to one count of conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.