Amanda Serino v. Payday California, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 201008-56940California828 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMANDA SERINO; ALBERTO No. 08-56940
CASTELLANOS; DAVE HAWK;
VANCE LORENZINI; BRUCE MIYAKI; D.C. No. 2:07-cv-05029-VBF-
DUSTIN POULTON; JASON SMITH; FFM
KENNETH VENABLE; TAD YENA
WINE,
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
PAYDAY CALIFORNIA, INC., a California Corporation; RON RENAUD, an individual; MICHAEL ROMERSA, an individual,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STEVE CHASE, an individual,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1 for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 6, 2010 ** Pasadena, California
Before: PREGERSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and GRAHAM, Senior District Judge.***
The plaintiffs-appellants contend they were paid late or not at all for services
rendered in the production of television…