Amanda Serino v. Payday California, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 201008-56940California828 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMANDA SERINO; ALBERTO No. 08-56940

CASTELLANOS; DAVE HAWK;

VANCE LORENZINI; BRUCE MIYAKI; D.C. No. 2:07-cv-05029-VBF-

DUSTIN POULTON; JASON SMITH; FFM

KENNETH VENABLE; TAD YENA

WINE,

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

PAYDAY CALIFORNIA, INC., a California Corporation; RON RENAUD, an individual; MICHAEL ROMERSA, an individual,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

STEVE CHASE, an individual,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1 for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 6, 2010 ** Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and GRAHAM, Senior District Judge.***

The plaintiffs-appellants contend they were paid late or not at all for services

rendered in the production of television…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.