United States v. Chang Guo You, United States of America v. Mi Ae Yim, AKA Mi Ae Pigman

Good Law
382 F.3d 958·2004 WL 1936387·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18350
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 200403-30420, 03-30421California3,998 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

A federal jury convicted Appellants, Chang Guo You and Mi Ae Yim, of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(A)(iii) for harboring illegal aliens. They now appeal their convictions and sentences. You argues that the court erred in (1) denying his motion for a retrial on double jeopardy grounds and (2) declining to grant him a downward departure during sentencing pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 or § 5K2.13. You and Yim both contend that the district court erred in instructing the jury. Finally, Yim argues that the district court erred in its determination that Yim failed to show that the government purposefully discriminated in making its peremptory challenges. We disagree with each contention and affirm the district court.

I

This appeal follows an initial trial, during which the court declared a mistrial, a subsequent retrial, and, finally, the sentencing hearing. We outline the proceedings’ three stages below.

A

The district court began a jury trial on March 31, 2003. On the second day of trial, the government called its first Spanish-speaking witness, but Yim objected to the government’s interpreter. After the defense conducted a cross-examination, the court determined that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.